Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 01:03
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Spiraling with ChatGPT - TechCrunch
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Is the media protecting Kamala Harris?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Where in Maine are you most likely to get a dangerous tick bite? - The Portland Press Herald
Thank you.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What is your favorite cuckold experience?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
What’s next?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Is it considered rude to comment on someone's weight? Is it simply stating a fact?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.